Legal Opinion

Carrillo v. Murray & Layne Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1923No. Civil No. 2054PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLyman, J.

This action is for the recovery of damages for the conversion of merchandise admitted to have been taken by the defendant from the storeroom of plaintiff. Defendant pleads in justification of the taking that it was by agreement with plaintiff for the satisfaction of an admitted indebtedness. Plaintiff was threatened with attachment on account of his indebtedness. The evidence tends to show that another creditor, Sonora Mercantile Company, sought to secure itself, and through its agents, Haymore and Douglas, suggested to plaintiff the satisfaction of both claims by the delivery to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Argetakis v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HenryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  2. Barnette v. McNultyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  3. New York Life Ins. Co. v. SeighmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  4. Hendricks v. SimperCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. Morgan v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API