Legal Opinion

Hendricks v. Simper

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 19, 1975No. 1 CA-CIV 2621PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Chief Judge.

On this appeal we are required to determine whether the trial judge erred in directing a verdict for the defendants (appellees). The sole issue at trial concerned the validity of a release which had been executed by the plaintiffs. The facts show that on November 25, 1969, plaintiff, John F. Hendricks, was injured while riding a horse near Holbrook, Arizona. The horse was owned by Austin Simper, who was insured by Farmers Insurance Group. After sustaining his injuries, Mr. Hendricks was transferred to Good Samaritan Hospital in Phoenix, Arizona. While a patient in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Davis v. WeberArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Cano v. NeillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  3. Dansby v. BuckArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Pass v. StephensArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Melvin v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Correa v. Pecos Valley Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  2. Cathemer v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  3. Nelson v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. Parrish v. United Bank of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. Silvas v. Speros Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API