Legal Opinion

Barnette v. McNulty

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 13, 1973No. 2 CA-CIV 1454PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

The appellant-plaintiff in this case disputed the testamentary disposition by her deceased husband of certain property and contended that the property was her sole and separate property upon her husband’s' death by virtue of an inter vivos trust. This appeal was undertaken when the trial court disagreed with appellant’s position and entered judgment in favor of appellee.

Appellant’s questions for review revolve around three general areas: (1) Did the deceased create a valid inter vivos trust? (2) Did the deceased revoke the trust? (3) Did the court err in the admission of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leahy v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  2. In Re Estate of CohenArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Coleman v. ColemanArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Carrillo v. Murray & Layne Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gelber v. GlockSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
  2. Moon v. Lesikar, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  3. Gardenhire v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Bourgeois v. HurleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  5. Paul v. ArvidsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API