Legal Opinion
Pullman Palace Car Co. v. Texas & Pacific R.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided April 15, 1882PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPardee, C. J.
The complainant sets forth in its bill an agreement alleged to have been made on the twenty-eighth day of February, 1874, with the defendant company, whereby the Pullman Company was to furnish sleeping cars to be used by the railway company, sufficient to moot the demands of travel on its line of road, to provide the necessary attendants therefor, and also keep said cars j ti good running order and repairs, except repairs and renewals made necessary by accident and casualty; it being understood that the railway company should repair all damages to said cars, of every kind, occasioned by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Willard v. TayloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- City of Chicago v. RumpffIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Mayor of Hudson v. ThorneNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
- Norwich Gas Light Co. v. Norwich City Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shubert v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Taussig v. CorbinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906
- Waite v. O'NeilU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1896
- Pantages v. GraumanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
- Blanton v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.