Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Rumpff

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1867PublishedCited by 60 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago. These were actions commenced by the appellant against the appellees, in the police court of the city of Chicago, for an alleged violation by them of an ordinance concerning slaughtering within the corporate limits. Appellees were fined in the police court, and appealed to the Superior Court, where a trial was had before the court, who rendered judgment for the appellees, from which appellant has prosecuted appeals to this court.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago. These were actions commenced by the appellant against the appellees, in the police court of the city of Chicago, for an alleged violation by them of an ordinance concerning slaughtering within the corporate limits. Appellees were fined in the police court, and appealed to the Superior Court, where a trial was had before the court, who rendered judgment for the appellees, from which appellant has prosecuted appeals to this court. The further facts in these cases are fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

As these eases present the same questions, they will be considered together in this opinion. It appears that the general assembly granted to the city of Chicago, in its charter, power to “ direct the location and management of, and to regulate and license breweries, tanneries and packing houses, and to direct the location, management and construction of, and to regulate, license, restrain, abate and prohibit within the city, and the distance of four miles therefrom, distilleries, slaughtering establishments, establishments for steaming or rendering lard, tallow, offal and such other…

2Cited by60 opinions

  1. City of Aurora v. BurnsIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Grant v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  3. Tugman v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Birmingham & Pratt Mines Street Railway Co. v. Birmingham Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Town of Crown PointIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API