Legal Opinion
Lai Chan v. Chinese-American Planning Council Home Attendant Program, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 9, 2015PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Carol R. Edmead, J.
In this class action suit alleging, inter alia, violations of the Labor Law, defendant Chinese-American Planning Council Home Attendant Program, Inc. moves pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1), (5) and (7) to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint or, in the alternative, to compel arbitration pursuant to CPLR 7503 (a).
Plaintiffs (or class members) are current and former employees of defendant, a not-for-profit corporation that provides home health care services to elderly and disabled residents of New York City.1 Plaintiffs assert claims against defendant for unpaid…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Goshen v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shillingford v. Astra Home Care, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Mei Kum Chu v. Chinese-American Planning Council Home Attendant Program, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Tokhtaman v. Human Care, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017