State Division of Human Rights v. Sweet Home Central School District Board of Education
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Determination of appeal board unanimously confirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioners seek review pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law of the order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board affirming a determination of the commissioner which found that petitioners had engaged in unlawful discriminatory practices against four female teachers. Petitioners, Sweet Home Central School District Board of Education and the Sweet Home Education Association, concede that the complainants (Hierl, Krawczyk, Reimer and Vogt) were in fact denied their sick leave benefits for maternity leave and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Matter of Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. BolandNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Brown v. RistichNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- State Division of Human Rights v. Board of Education of the City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rodolico v. Unisys Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- State Division of Human Rights v. City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- State Division of Human Rights v. Sweet Home Education Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979