Legal Opinion
In re Stacy
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided December 26, 1934PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOLYNEAUX, District Judge.
The proceeding is before the court upon an order to show cause issued by the court on the petition of Louis D. Roberge and Sarah Roberge, requiring the bankrupt to show cause why the court should not make its order:
1. Dismissing the petition of Sherman U. Stacy, bankrupt, as to the petitioners, Louis D. Roberge and Sarah Roberge and as to the land involved described in the petition.
2. Enjoining and prohibiting the bankrupt, Sherman U. Stacy, from doing any act or thing by virtue of or under this proceeding in any way interfering with these petitioners, Louis D.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ward v. First Nat. Bank of IrontonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- In re GoldsmithDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1902
- Tinkcom v. LewisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- Gardner v. W. M. Prindle & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Berthold v. HolmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Johnson v. First National Bank Of MontevideoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Johnson v. First National BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- In re RFC & Rescap Liquidating Trust ActionDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
- Bradford v. FaheyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- Layton v. LaytonUtah Supreme Court · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.