Beck v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant was indicted and convicted of robbery under the statute applicable to the District of Columbia.1 On this appeal he says: “The sole point stressed * * * is the 'improper comment made by the trial judge in his argument [charge] to the jury and the failure of the trial judge to clarify an instruction requested by appellant.”
The evidence for the United States was that at about 7:30 in the evening of August 1, 1942, on Third Street, between B and C Streets, Southeast, in the City of Washington, appellant and one Brown accosted one McGrath, whom they knew, and who was then in a drunken…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Russell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nelson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Fitzgerald LovellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Fred John Corey and Mary Carolyn Fulghum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Gale v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Prezzi v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.