Legal Opinion

Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. v. Lee

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 1963No. Civ. 26363PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, P. J.

Plaintiffs, coproducers of a motion picture, brought this suit to enjoin, as unfair competition, use by defendants of an advertising slogan which plaintiffs claim trades and capitalizes on advance publicity covering the title they have adopted for their picture. Defendants’ slogan is designed to advertise a picture arising from the same subject matter as plaintiffs’ picture. The complaint also alleged damages and sought an accounting of profits. The trial court awarded a preliminary injunction and defendants appeal. The sole ground relied upon as requiring a reversal of the trial court’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. SahatiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  2. Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Riviello v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers & Cosmetologists' International Union of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Bomberger v. McKelveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Nancy Sinatra v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., an Ohio Corporation, Young & Rubicam, Inc., Anew York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. Ball v. American Trial Lawyers Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Orion Pictures Co., Inc. v. Dell Publishing Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  4. Winchester Mystery House v. Global Asylum, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Allied Artists Pictures Corp. v. FriedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API