Bendan Holding Corp. v. Rodner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order denying defendant’s motion to serve an amended answer reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, upon condition that the date of issue remain the same; the proposed amended answer to be served within five days from the entry of the order herein. Whether or not the proposed defense is meritorious must be decided at the trial. It cannot be determined on affidavits. The courts have adopted a liberal policy in permitting amendments to enable parties to litigate all questions affecting their rights. Lazansky, P. J., Young,…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Newman v. GoldbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Green Point Savings Bank v. Central Gardens Unit No. 1, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Cadran v. FanniSuffolk County District Court · 1972
- Hasen v. ApselNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Martin v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.