Martin v. Katz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
It is well settled that the courts should adopt a liberal policy in allowing amendments to pleadings at any time before the trial to the end that the parties may have a full and just determination of the action upon the merits (see 4 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, § 26, p. 568; Shuffman v. Shuffman, 6 A D 2d 1030), and that, as a general proposition, questions relating to the sufficiency and the merits of the defenses proposed to be added by amendment should be reserved for determination on a proper motion or upon the trial. (See 4 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, § 25, p. 566; also Bendan…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bendan Holding Corp. v. RodnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Anderson v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Cohen v. DanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
3Cited by2 opinions
- Yoli v. YoliNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- Fulford v. Baker Perkins, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984