Legal Opinion

Martin v. Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 21, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It is well settled that the courts should adopt a liberal policy in allowing amendments to pleadings at any time before the trial to the end that the parties may have a full and just determination of the action upon the merits (see 4 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, § 26, p. 568; Shuffman v. Shuffman, 6 A D 2d 1030), and that, as a general proposition, questions relating to the sufficiency and the merits of the defenses proposed to be added by amendment should be reserved for determination on a proper motion or upon the trial. (See 4 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, § 25, p. 566; also Bendan…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bendan Holding Corp. v. RodnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  2. Anderson v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  3. Cohen v. DanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Yoli v. YoliNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Fulford v. Baker Perkins, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API