Legal Opinion

Hasen v. Apsel

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacob J. Schwartzwald, J.

Defendant moves for leave to amend her verified answer so as to include therein a denial of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations of paragraph I of the complaint.

Paragraph I recites that “plaintiff and defendant were brother and sister and the children of Joseph Hasenfratz, now deceased.”

The action is one in which plaintiff seeks to impress a trust upon parcels of real property which he alleges were conveyed by decedent Hasenfratz to defendant upon the understanding that they were to be held in trust for said decedent and that they would be reconveyed to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gillette v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  2. Milliken v. McGarrahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. Washington Life Insurance v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  4. Coron v. LincksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. Bendan Holding Corp. v. RodnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cadran v. FanniSuffolk County District Court · 1972
  2. Levert v. Central School District No. 6New York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API