Legal Opinion · Dissent

Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 14, 1967No. 339-65Published

1DissentDtjrpee, Judge

In Wisconsin v. Sanapaw et al. 21 Wis. 2d 377, 124 N. W. 2d 41 (19.63), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 991 (1964), rehearing denied 379 U.S. 871- (1964), tbe Wisconsin Supreme Court held that Congress by its enactment of Section 10 of the Menominee Termination Act of 1954 ended plaintiff’s unregulated hunting and fishing and brought them within the purview of the state’s game laws. See 68 Stat. 250, 25 U.S.C. § 899 (1964). The state court found that the state’s asserted regulation of the Indians was derivative of Federal statutes and that the Indians had no claim against the state. The majority of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Martin v. CreasySupreme Court of the United States · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API