Dose v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Stone, Justice.
Action to reform, and as reformed to recover upon, a Minnesota standard policy of fire insurance. Defendant appeals from the judgment for plaintiffs.
The plea for reformation was put upon the ground of mutual mistake as to the property to be covered. Plaintiffs own two properties on Hamline avenue in St. Paul, one at No. 528 and one at No. 536. The policy as issued covered No. 528. Plaintiffs assert, and therein are sustained by the decision below, that the intention was to insure No. 536, where occurred the fire damage to an amount not in dispute.
There was submitted to a jury…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gude v. Exchange Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Fredman v. Consolidated Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Buzalsky v. BuzalskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Zenith Box & Lumber Co. v. National Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- First National Bank v. QuevliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Travelers Indemnity Company, a Corporation v. National Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, a Corporation v. William A. Craigie and Bette P. CraigieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Thibault v. BostromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Born v. Medico Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.