Legal Opinion

Fredman v. Consolidated Fire & Marine Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 24, 1908No. Nos. 15,489-(203). [fn2]PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Action in the district court for Ramsey county to have an insurance policy reformed and to recover upon it as reformed the sum of one thousand dollars. The case was tried before Orr, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff for the sum demanded. Defendant’s motion to amend the findings was granted in part and denied in part. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

This was an action to reform a policy of fire insurance and to recover thereon as reformed. The trial court found in favor of the plaintiff on all the issues, and the defendant appealed from the judgment.

For some time prior to 1906 the Consolidated Fire & Marine Insurance Company had been engaged in business in the state of Minnesota, and was represented at St. Paul by Warner & Regensdorf as its duly appointed and commissioned agents, with authority to fix premiums, receive money, countersign, approve, and issue policies, and gen erally represent the company. Joseph Bergfeld was an insurance…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hermann v. Niagara Fire InsururanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. East Texas Fire Insurance v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hankins v. Rockford Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  4. John R. Davis Lumber Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Indiana Insurance v. HartwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Morrison v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Travelers Indemnity Company, a Corporation v. National Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  3. Braman v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  4. Luthy v. Northwestern National InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Krug Park Amusement Co. v. New York Underwriters InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API