Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Ry., & Motor Coach Employees of America, Division 1063
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Per curiam
The complaint in this cause was filed after the 1947 reenactment and codification of the Arbitration Act. 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. Under the original Act of 1925, 43 Stat. 883, we held in Donahue v. Susquehanna Collieries Co., 3 Cir., 138 F.2d 3, 149 A.L.R. 271, and Watkins v. Hudson Coal Co., 3 Cir., 151 F.2d 311, that the language used in Section 1 “ * * * but nothing herein contained shall apply to contracts of employment of * * * any * * * class of workers engaged in * * * interstate commerce” was merely an exclusion in the definition of “commerce” in that Section, and did not constitute an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Donahue v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Watkins v. Hudson Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Amalgamaged Ass'n of Street, Electric Ry. And Motor Coach Employees of America, Local Division 1210 v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Amalgamated Ass'n of StreetDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
3Cited by29 opinions
- Drake Bakeries Inc. v. Local 50, American Bakery & Confectionery Workers InternationalSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Tenney Engineering, Inc. v. United Electrical Radio & MacHine Workers of America, (u.e.) Local 437Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- McCarroll v. Los Angeles County District Council of CarpentersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Jaswinder Singh v. Uber Technologies IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Signal-Stat Corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Local 475, United Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers of America (Ue)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.