Legal Opinion

Vargas v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1998No. 96-288PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

Appellant, Rene Segura Vargas (Vargas), appeals his conviction on two counts of conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance, one count of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, and one count of causing serious bodily injury to a peace officer in the performance of his duty. Finding sufficient evidence to support the conviction, no violation of Vargas’ constitutional rights, and no abuse of discretion in the denial of his *987motion to sever the counts for trial, we affirm.

I. ISSUES

Vargas presents four issues:

ISSUE I

Whether the appellant was denied his…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. Herman PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Cecil L. BursonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Wesley WillieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Allen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Trujillo v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Almada v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Whitney v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Strandlien v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API