In re the Marriage of Trickel

Husband appeals from a post-dissolution order amending a dissolution judgment. He argues that the order was an improper modification of the judgment. We reverse.

In 1985, the dissolution judgment awarded wife the “remaining two (2) payments due Respondent under that certain agreement of sale of capital stock * * *” and directed an escrow agent, on receipt of the payments, to make payment to wife. No payments were made thereafter. In 1986, husband and his co-vendors filed an action against the purchasers of the stock, alleging that they were owed the unpaid balance. A default judgment was…