Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Cross

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 30, 1981No. D7602-02056, CA A20248PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Husband appeals from an order amending a decree of dissolution. The amendment was based on a finding that the provisions of the decree relating to spousal support were ambiguous. We review de novo. ORS 19.125(3).

The decree approved and incorporated a property settlement agreement. Wife was awarded the residence subject to indebtedness.1 The language of the decree and the property settlement agreement were identical with respect to the time spousal support was to terminate. The decree, in relevant part, provided:

“Payment shall continue until the death of petitioner [husband] or respondent…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bennett v. BennettOregon Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of WinningstadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. Gourley v. ToweryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. In re the Marriage of HeathmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. In re the Marriage of TrickelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. In re the Marriage of GramCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API