Legal Opinion

American, Inc. v. Bishop

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1947No. 30280PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

An agreement, contract, or promise authorizing or employing an agent or broker to sell or purchase real estate for compensation or a commission is void unless such agreement, contract, or promise, or some note or memorandum thereof, be in writing, signed by the party to be charged therewith or his agent. Rem. Rev. Stat., § 5825 [P.P.C. § 577-3], with particular reference to subd. (5) thereof.

An oral promise to pay such a commission is involved in the present case. Appellants, who were licensed real-estate brokers, contend that their action is not upon the void promise but is an action for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cassidy v. Kraft-Phenix Cheese Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Kroger v. BaurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Chambers v. KirkpatrickWashington Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mele v. CerenzieWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Showcase Realty, Inc. v. WhittakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. Gertz v. ShaefferWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Showcase Realty, Inc. v. M. K. WhittakerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API