Legal Opinion

Raydon Exploration, Inc. v. Ladd

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1990No. 88-2872PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAFFELS, District Judge.

This diversity jurisdiction case arises from an agreement involving oil and gas development on two sections of land. After a two day court trial, the United States District Court for the Western District of *1498Oklahoma1 found that the defendants-appellants Frank A. Ladd and Dudley R. Stanley, d/b/a H & L Operating Co. (H & L) failed to perform an express condition of its agreement with plaintiff-appellee Ray-don Exploration, Inc. (Raydon). Therefore, the district court granted Raydon’s request for equitable relief rescinding the agreement and further ordering Raydon to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cowles v. Dow Keith Oil & Gas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  2. Ollie v. RainboltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  3. Smith v. SpeedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  4. Davis v. HastingsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. Farmers' Produce Co. v. McAlester Storage & Commission Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gresser v. HotzlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  2. State Department of Transportation v. Providence & Worcester RailroadSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  3. Ershick v. United Missouri Bank of Kansas City, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. Medina v. Housing Authority of San Miguel CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. University of Colorado Foundation, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API