Legal Opinion
Sanjuan v. IBP, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 10, 2000No. Civ.A. 94-1541-DESPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAFFELS, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Alternative Motion for a New Trial (Docs. 146 and 218). For the reasons set forth below, the court denies both motions.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Guillermo Sanjuan (“Sanjuan”) brought this action alleging that he was fired from his job at IBP, Inc. (“IBP”) in retaliation for exercising his statutory rights under the Kansas Workers’ Compensation Act, Kan.Stat.Ann. § 44-501, et. seq.
Sanjuan began working as a flanker at IBP’s Holcomb, Kansas, plant in May…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Murphy v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
- Candi Ryder v. The City of Topeka and Michael MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Nordstrom v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Ortega v. IBP, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sanjuan v. IBP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Gertsch v. Central Electropolishing Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
- Thidsorn v. Excel CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000