Sanjuan v. IBP, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Following a jury trial, IBP, Inc., was found to have retaliated against an employee, Guillermo Sanjuan, in violation of Kansas public policy, after Sanjuan exercised rights available to him under the Kansas Workers Compensation Act, Kan. Stat. Ann. §§ 44-501 to -5125. On appeal, IBP makes numerous allegations of error by the district court, including a refusal to grant judgment as a matter of law; issuance of legally erroneous jury instructions; and assessment of punitive damages despite insufficient evidence. The central issue presented is whether Kansas law requires a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bausman v. Interstate Brands Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Murphy v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
- Anaeme v. Diagnostek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Baty v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Ortega v. IBP, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Proctor v. United Parcel ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Doebele v. Sprint/United Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- M.D. Mark, Inc. v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Jones v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Foster v. AlliedSignal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.