Legal Opinion

Middleton v. Pritchard

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1842PublishedCited by 8 opinions

This was an action of trespass quare clausum fregk, instituted in the Madison Circuit Court, by Middleton against Pritchard and Hafford, for the recovery of damages which the plaintiff had sustained by the cutting of trees on land which he claimed to be in his possession.

Read the full summary

This was an action of trespass quare clausum fregk, instituted in the Madison Circuit Court, by Middleton against Pritchard and Hafford, for the recovery of damages which the plaintiff had sustained by the cutting of trees on land which he claimed to be in his possession. The cause was heard before the Hon. Sidney Breese and a jury, at the September term, 1841, when the following bills of exceptions were taken, which show the facts in the case: “ Be it remembered, that on the trial of the above entitled case, the plaintiff showed title in one Robert Smith, to the east half of fractional…

1Opinion of the CourtScates, Justice

Trespass for cutting and carrying away timber. The title was admitted to be in the plaintiff to the east half of fractional section thirteen, township five, north of the base line, and range ten west of the third principal meridian. The defendants admitted the cutting and carrying away the timber from an island, or peninsula of land in front of the above premises, and separated from it by a slough; but deny that the locus in quo is included in, and part of, the above fractional half section; and this is the only question for the determination of this Court.

The Court below refused instructions…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Canal Commissioners v. PeopleCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830
  2. Palmer v. MulliganNew York Supreme Court · 1805
  3. People ex rel. Tibbits v. Canal AppraisersNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  4. Shrunk v. President of the Schuylkill Navigation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1826
  5. Hayes's v. BowmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1823

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Backus v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Lattig v. ScottIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Chandos v. MackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Menasha Wooden Ware Co. v. LawsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API