Legal Opinion

People v. Hill

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 23, 1996No. 96SA289PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Vollack

In this interlocutory appeal, the People seek review of an order entered by the Eagle County District Court suppressing (a) evidence of controlled substances found in the defendant’s possession and (b) statements made by the defendant. The trial court determined that the police officers lacked probable cause to arrest or search the defendant at the time the officers searched the defendant’s automobile. We reverse the trial court’s ruling.

I

On March 13, 1996, at approximately 7:45 p.m., Officer Albert Stutson (Officer Stutson) and Officer Brian Hoffman (Officer Hoffman) of the Vail Police…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. William L. Witt(074468)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  2. People v. PaynterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. People v. CascioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. People v. PadgettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. People v. AltmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API