Carlisle v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIAN, Judge.
The offense is uttering and using a forged deed; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for ten years.
It was alleged in the indictment, in substance, that appellant uttered and used the forged deed by exhibiting a photostatic copy thereof to divers persons whose names were to the grand jury unknown. Upon the trial the witnesses to whom a photo static copy of said deed had been so exhibited testified for the State. The evidence fails to show that appellant exhibited said copy to any person or persons, except the witnesses who testified for the State that he had…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Moseley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- McKay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Yantis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Seidman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Hunnicutt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002