Moseley v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Judge.
Conviction for receiving a stolen horse, .knowing the same to have been stolen, the property of W. E. Roberts. The indictment alleges that Sam Adams and Will Moseley received the property from Sam Stanfield. Linder this allegation the State must prove, in order to sustain the conviction, that appellant received the property from,.Sam Stanfield. Proof that he received it from some other person would not be sufficient to sustain the indictment. The court submitted to the jury all of the issues presented by the evidence fully and very clearly. The only question for us to decide…
2Cited by23 opinions
- Sue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
- Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Winfrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Ross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.