Cascadia Wildlands Project v. United States Forest Service
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KING, District Judge.
The Honorable John Jelderks, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on July 13, 2005. Plaintiffs filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation. When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate’s report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920, 102 S.Ct. 1277, 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982). The…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- WildEarth Guardians v. JeffriesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- Bark v. NorthropDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2014