Legal Opinion

Barfield v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1984No. 49706-1PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.

In these consolidated cases we review two pretrial discovery orders involving Seattle Police Department Internal Investigation Files (SPDIIF). At issue is whether plaintiffs may obtain discovery of SPDIIF involving prior complaints against the officers in actions alleging tortious conduct by police officers; negligent hiring, retention, and discipline; and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights violations.

In Barfield v. Seattle the following facts are pertinent. Plaintiffs David Barfield and Garry Biney were riding a motorcycle in April 1980. Police Officer T. C. Dillon, in plain clothes and an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Hearst Corp. v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Rhinehart v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Martinelli v. DIST. COURT IN & FOR CITY, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. John Doe v. Puget Sound Blood CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Cowles Publishing Co. v. State PatrolWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Snedigar v. HoddersenWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API