Legal Opinion

Dorman v. Castro

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided August 8, 2002No. 2:01-cv-05905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Of Decision And Order

SPATT, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs bring this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that Defendants violated several of their constitutionally protected rights. Presently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

BACKGROUND

The relevant events underlying this action took place on the shore of Long Beach Point (“Long Beach”). Long Beach is part of Orient Beach State Park, and thus, as a New York state park is regulated and maintained…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burg v. GosselinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Dorman v. CastroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  3. Dorman v. CastroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API