Legal Opinion

Dorman v. Castro

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 20, 2003No. Docket No. 02-9026PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs-Appellants Mary D. Dorman, Troy Gustavson, and Joseph Townsend appeal from that part of the August 9, 2002 judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Arthur D. Spatt, Judge) dismissing their claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of the First and Fourth Amendments and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over their remaining state law claims. The facts of this case are discussed in greater detail in the District Court’s August 8, 2002 Memorandum of Decision and Order. See Dorman v. Castro, 214 F.Supp.2d 299…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Murphy v. LynnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  3. Golino v. City of New HavenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. Britton v. MaloneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  5. Dorman v. CastroDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burrell v. VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  2. Dorman v. CastroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API