Legal Opinion

Buddy's Plant Plus Corp v. Centimark Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 6, 2015No. 13-4683, 14-1007UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION *

COWEN, Circuit Judge.

In this diversity case, a jury returned a $1.8 million verdict in favor of Plaintiff Buddy’s Plant Plus Corporation (“Buddy’s”) and against Defendant CentiMark . Corporation (“CentiMark”) on Buddy’s breach of contract and warranty claims. Although the Magistrate Judge ultimately upheld the verdict in its favor, Buddy’s appeals from the Magistrate Judge’s order granting summary judgment in favor of CentiMark with respect to Buddy’s claim of ■ fraudulent inducement. CentiMark filed a cross-appeal of its own. We will affirm.

I

This action arose out of CentiMark’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Yocca v. Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Bardwell v. the Willis CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Hanna M. Ayoub and Margaret Ayoub, His Wife v. Dr. H. N. Spencer, M. D.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. CATENA v. NVR, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. Catawissa Township v. Midland Asphalt Materials, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. FROBE v. UPMC ST. MARGARETDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API