Legal Opinion

FROBE v. UPMC ST. MARGARET

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 31, 2023No. 2:20-cv-00957Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DAWN FROBE, RACHEL WIEST, 2:20-CV-00957-CCW Plaintiffs, v. UPMC ST. MARGARET, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER In this case, Plaintiffs Dawn Frobe and Rachel Wiest bring claims against Defendant UPMC St. Margaret (“St. Margaret”) under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq., Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”), 43 P.S. § 951, et seq., and Pennsylvania common law. The claims arise from Plaintiffs’ past employment with St. Margaret, where they worked as housekeepers and were exposed…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Carol Heller v. Shaw Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  4. Abrams v. Lightolier Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  5. W. Channing Nicholas, M.D. v. Pennsylvania State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API