Legal Opinion

Lentz v. Baker

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 16, 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals the jury verdict finding liability but no damage in his alienation of affections suit on grounds the verdict is inconsistent. We affirm.

Gary and Teresa Lentz married in June 1976. As a journeyman boilermaker, plaintiff Gary Lentz experienced lengthy periods of unemployment. When employed, he worked long hours, and at times was required to leave his family and travel to other states to obtain employment. As a result of the long hours, the absences, and the lack of money, the marriage was under stress. Sexual incompatibility and plaintiff’s physical…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stone v. HindsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1976
  2. Wyman v. WallaceWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Fundermann v. MickelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  4. Wyman v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  5. Byron Roberts v. John Berry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dupuis v. HandTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hanover v. RuchTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Ragsdale v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  4. Terri G. Bowers v. Frederick Allan BowersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API