Wyman v. Wallace
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Per curiam
Quaere: Should the common-law action for the alienation of affections of a spouse be abolished?
We conclude that it should be.
The action for alienation of affections, insofar as it pertains to relationships between spouses, is an action carried into the law of Washington by its adoption of the common law of England. Beach v. Brown, 20 Wash. 266, 55 P. 46 (1898). We adopted the common law prior to statehood in 1863. RCW 4.04.010; In re Hudson, 13 Wn.2d 673, 126 P.2d 765 (1942). Freehe v. Freehe, 81 Wn.2d 183, 500 P.2d 771 (1972), recognized that when a rule of law has had its origins in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Freehe v. FreeheWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Pierce v. Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- In Re the Welfare of HudsonWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Borst v. BorstWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Moulin v. MonteleoneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Nelson v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Lovelace Medical Center v. Mendez Ex Rel. MendezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Wyman v. WallaceWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- O'NEIL v. SchuckardtIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Bearbower v. MerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.