Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. City of San Jose

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 14, 2017No. Case No.16-CV-03957-LHKPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART WITH PREJUDICE AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS

Re: Dkt. No. 44

LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge

Plaintiffs Juan Hernandez, Nathan Velasquez, Frank Velasquez, Rachel- Casey, Mark Doering, Mary Doering, Barbara Arigoni, Dustin Haines-Scrodin, Andrew Zambetti, Christina Wong, Craig Parsons, the minor I.P., Greg Hyver, Todd Broome, Donovan Rost, Michele Wilson, Cole Cassady, Theodore Jones, Martin Mercado, and Christopher Holland (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this putative class action against Defendants the City of San Jose (“City”); San Jose Police Chief…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Juan Hernandez v. City of San JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Flynn v. City of Santa ClaraDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
  3. In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
  4. Life Savers Concepts Ass'n of Cal. v. WynarDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
  5. Cisco Systems, Inc. v. ChungDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API