Legal Opinion

In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust Litigation

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 26, 2017No. Case No.: 15-MD-2670 JLS (MDD)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS

(ECF Nos. 408, 409, 412)

Hon. Janis L. Sammartino, United States District Judge

Presently before the Court are:(1) Defendants StarKist Co.’s, Dongwon Industries Co., Ltd.’s, Bumble Bee Foods, LLC’s, Tri-Union Seafoods, LLC’s, Thai Union Group PCL’s, and Del- Monte Corporation’s (“Joint Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss all Plaintiffs’ Complaints1 for (A) failure to allege any factual allegations supporting a post-2013 packaged tuna conspiracy, (B) improperly claiming an entitlement to discovery concerning non-tuna products, and (C)…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Packaged Seafood Prods. Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
  2. Gardner v. Starkist Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
  3. Hamman v. Cava Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023
  4. In re California Gasoline Spot Market Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  5. Interior Electric Incorporated Nevada v. T.W.C. Construction, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API