Legal Opinion

Lucas v. E.A. Buschmann, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 31, 1995PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANA, Justice.

E.A. Buschmann, Inc., appeals from decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board awarding attorney fees to its employee, Paul Lucas, and penalizing Buschmann for its failure to pay the fees awarded during the pen-dency of an appeal from that order. We conclude that the failure to pay the attorney fee award was not a failure to pay “compensation” pursuant to 39 M.R.S.A. § 104-A. The Board was not authorized to award a penalty for the employer’s failure to pay attorney fees during the pendency of the appeal or to award counsel fees to the employee for the penalty proceeding. We…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  2. Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  3. Davis v. Scott Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  4. Madore v. Bangor Roof & Sheet Metal Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. Gordon v. Maine Reduction Company, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Community Telecommunications Corp. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  2. LaPointe v. United Engineers & ConstructorsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  3. Campbell v. School Administrative District No. 59Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  4. Kinney v. Great Northern Paper, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. Community Telecommunications Corp. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API