Kinney v. Great Northern Paper, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
WATHEN, Chief Justice.
The employer, Great Northern Paper, Inc., appeals from three decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board awarding interest on the assessment of attorney fees. 39 M.R.S.A. § 72 (1989), repealed and replaced by P.L.1991, ch. 885, §§ A-7, A-8. Because we agree with Great Northern that employees are not entitled to interest on the assessment of attorney fees pursuant to former section 72, we vacate the decisions of the Board.
Dean Kinney, David Waltz and Gerald Seavey suffered work-related injuries prior to the effective date of the 1992 Act while employed by Great Northern.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Scott's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
- Harding v. Sheridan D. Smith, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Gordon v. Maine Reduction Company, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- Lucas v. E.A. Buschmann, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Guiggey v. Great Northern Paper, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997