Legal Opinion
In Rem Tax Foreclosure Action No. 29
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 17, 1982PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*664OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward J. Greenfield, J.
Petitioner, West 105th Street Homesteaders Housing Development Fund Corporation (Homesteaders), moves to vacate and set aside, nunc pro tunc, the prior order of this court (Stecher, J.), entered on default and dated May 14, 1981. This motion is joined in by petitioner, City of New York (City).
Previously, the Homesteaders moved to intervene in the proceeding brought by the City to vacate the prior order on the grounds that their prior order was fraudulently and was improperly-obtained. The Homesteaders’ motion was granted without opposition by order…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Moran v. RynarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Cameron Estates, Inc. v. DeeringNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Joslyn v. . RockwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Batista v. St. Luke's HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- George F. Weaver Sons Co. v. BurgessNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Tax Foreclosure No. 35Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Lily Pond Enterprises, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Kaufman v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Weigner v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- In re Tax Foreclosure No. 35New York Supreme Court · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.