In re Tax Foreclosure No. 35
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Niehoff, J. P.
On this appeal, we are called upon to determine the constitutionality of the Administrative Code of the City of New York former chapter 17, title D (now tit 11, ch 4), which does not provide for personal notice to a person having an interest in real property prior to an in rem tax foreclosure, unless such person has filed an owner registration card or an “in rem” card with the Commissioner of Finance of the City of New York (also called the Finance Administrator). The appellant’s contention that the notice provisions of the Administrative Code have deprived…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Leigh v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- In re the Foreclosure of Tax LiensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Town of Somers v. CoveyNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- ISCA Enterprises v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Small Engine Shop, Inc. v. Concetta Cangelosi Cascio, Don HathawayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Township of Jefferson v. Block 447A, Lot 10New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Alliance Property Management & Development, Inc. v. Andrews Avenue Equities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Tref Realty Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.