Legal Opinion
Eigerman v. Putnam Investments, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 20, 2007PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.
The plaintiff seeks declaratory relief and monetary *282damages against the defendants Putnam Investments, Inc. (Putnam), and its subsidiary, Putnam Investment Management, LLC (Management), for breach of his contract of employment. The breach allegedly occurred when Putnam adopted an informal policy discouraging the plaintiff2 from exercising his right to tender, for redemption by Putnam, shares of Class B common stock received pursuant to an employee equity participation plan. A judge in the Superior Court allowed the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, pursuant to Mass. R. Civ. P. 12…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Noonan v. Staples, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Balles v. Babcock Power Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
- Polay v. McMahonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Warren Freedenfeld Associates, Inc. v. McTigueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.