Legal Opinion

Baines v. Brady

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided November 12, 1953No. Civ. A. No. 13PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConley, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment against him in the sum of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for false imprisonment. The appellant raises two points in his brief: first, he contends that the record fails *959to establish any false imprisonment; and secondly, he argues that the proof does not justify the amount of the award.

Findings of fact were waived, through the failure of either party to request them (Code Civ. Proc., § 632); consequently, it must be assumed that the trial court decided every essential factual issue in favor of the plaintiff; furthermore, this court must view…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. AgnewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Gisske v. SandersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  3. Miller v. FanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Nelson v. KelloggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Gomez v. ScanlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Washington v. FarliceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Pamela D. Vickroy v. Pathways, Inc., Dyersburg, TN, Kimberly Bord, J. Forstlam, M.D. Methodist Hospital, Coleman Foss, Administrator, and Western Mental Health InstituteCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API