Legal Opinion

Washington v. Farlice

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 1991No. B042996PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

Appellant, Nora F. Farlice, appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict claiming the award of compensatory damages of $10,000 for the false imprisonment of respondent Lynell Washington was unsupported by the evidence. Appellant also contends the $50,000 award of punitive damages is excessive as a matter of law. We conclude the compensatory damage award is supported by substantial evidence and affirm that award. However, we further conclude insufficient evidence was produced at trial to support the punitive damage award of $50,000. We consequently reverse that portion…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Adams v. MurakamiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Newman v. Emerson Radio Corp.California Supreme Court · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lara v. CadagCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Pooshs v. Phillip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  3. Herrick v. Quality Hotels, Inns & Resorts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Starr Indemnity & Liability Co. v. American Claims Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  5. Kelly v. HaagCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API