Legal Opinion

Schumacher v. City of Excelsior

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 12, 1988No. C8-87-1890Published

1Opinion of the Court

427 N.W.2d 235 (1988)

James J. SCHUMACHER, Arnold J. Feinberg, Robert H. Schumacher, and Ron McDaniels, Respondents,

v.

CITY OF EXCELSIOR, Minnesota, Appellant.

No. C8-87-1890.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

August 12, 1988.

Thomas J. Barrett, Thomas J. Radio, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Frank R. Berman, Scott G. Harris, Minneapolis, for respondents.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

SIMONETT, Justice.

The trial court found that the city's reconstruction of one of its streets conferred no special benefit on the subject property, and that the special city assessment against the…

Also in this document: Dissent · Amdahl; Dissent · Kelley.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Buettner v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Hartle v. City of GlencoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Schumacher v. City of ExcelsiorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Dosedel v. City of Ham LakeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API