Legal Opinion
Hartle v. City of Glencoe
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 7, 1975No. 44813PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants challenge the validity of assessments levied by respondent for sewer and water improvements. The district court upheld the assessments and we affirm.
Respondent city of Glencoe has a population of 4,500 people. The city includes older residential areas as well as several new additions, including one known as Glenview Woods. Appellants are residents of Glenview Woods. The older residential area has been served by city sewer and water for some time. In 1966, the city council first discussed the possibility of extending sewer and water service to the new additions. However, at that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. City of ElySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Quality Homes, Inc. v. Village of New BrightonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- E. H. Willmus Properties, Inc. v. Village of New BrightonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- American Oil Company v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- City of Glencoe v. BenekeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Buettner v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Anderson v. City of BemidjiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- City of New Brighton v. Metropolitan CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Nyquist v. Town Center, Crow Wing CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.