Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Giese
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 19, 1950No. 35,258PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Chief Justice.
This was an action in the district court in Mille Lacs county for partition. Defendant Anton A. Giese counterclaimed for reformation of certain deeds. The court made findings of fact and conclusions of law in favor of plaintiffs. Defendant Anton Giese first appealed to this court from the order denying his motion to amend the findings and conclusions of law and order for judgment, which we held nonappealable. Johnson v. Giese, 230 Minn. 185, 40 N. W. (2d) 909. Defendant Giese is now here on an appeal from the judgment.
Plaintiffs commenced this proceeding for partition of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fritz v. FritzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Macomber v. KinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Corcoran v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Joint Council No. 32Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Chadbourn v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Mahoney v. Minnesota Farmers Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gartner v. GartnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Glaser v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Dietz v. Phipps (In Re Sunde)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- Farmers' Store of Wheaton, Inc. v. Delaware Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Estate of Wasie v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.