Legal Opinion
M.O. v. New York City Department of Education
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 27, 2014No. 12 Civ. 4619(MGC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CEDARBAUM, District Judge.
Plaintiffs M.O. and G.O. bring this tuition reimbursement action for the 2011-2012 school year on behalf of their son, D.O., under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq., against the New York City Department of Education (“DOE”).
In June of 2011, pursuant to IDEA, a local Committee on Special Education developed an individualized education program (“IEP”) for D.O., classifying him as speech or language impaired and recommending he repeat the second grade in a class with a 12:1:1 ratio of students…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- R.E. Ex Rel. J.E. v. New York City Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- M.H. v. New York City Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Joan Grim and Steven Grim, Parents of a Disabled Child, Chelsea v. Rhinebeck Central School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Lillbask ex rel. Mauclaire v. Connecticut Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Garro v. ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- M.O. ex rel. D.O. v. New York City Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- J.M. v. New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- M.O. & G.O. v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015