State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Ankrom
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GUNN, Judge.
The property owner in a condemnation proceeding raises two points of alleged trial court error in her appeal: (1) in excluding evidence of comparable land sales; (2) undue restriction in cross-examination of the State Highway Commission’s expert witness. We affirm.
The State Highway Commission condemned a portion of the appellant property owner’s farm near Bowling Green for highway purposes. The property owner called two expert witnesses to testify as to alleged comparable land sales. The first witness testified that damages for the taking were $113,805. His opinion was based on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Armory Site in Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- City of St. Louis v. KislingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Board of Public Buildings v. GMT Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Kelso v. C. B. K. Agronomics, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. JasperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Frank v. Environmental Sanitation Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. RothMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. KoziatekMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Frank v. Environmental Sanitation Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985